DOMINOS PIZZA INC DPZ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1286681Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Davis PolkFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ropes & Gray | Apr 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Davis Polk | May 2004 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Piper Rudnick | May 2004 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Craig E. MarcusRopes & GrayFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Jane D. GoldsteinRopes & GrayFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Gerald S. TanenbaumCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Craig E. MarcusRopes & Gray | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Jane D. GoldsteinRopes & Gray | Jul 2004 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Gerald S. TanenbaumCahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 20 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 1.60 |