PREMIER ENTERTAINMENT BILOXI LLC
CIK 1286382Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Balch & BinghamFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Phelps DunbarFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Watkins Ludlam Winter & StennisFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.31×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duane Morris | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Akerman LLP | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
| Balch & Bingham | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 42 | 1.59 | 0.55 | 1.12 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Phelps Dunbar | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 48 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Piper Rudnick | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Watkins Ludlam Winter & Stennis | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 32 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.31 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David J. KaufmanDuane MorrisFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Gary KasharWhite & CaseFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David J. KaufmanDuane Morris | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
| Gary KasharWhite & Case | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 16 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.68 |