CLEARWIRE CORP CLWR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1285551Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Jul 2007 to Jul 2012
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Preston Gates & EllisFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Kilpatrick StocktonFirst linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Day Berry & HowardFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.27 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Preston Gates & Ellis | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 159 | 1.36 | 1.62 | 1.44 |
| Winston & Strawn | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| DLA Piper | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Kilpatrick Stockton | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 191 | 0.88 | 0.37 | 0.91 |
| Day Berry & Howard | May 2006 | Text search only | 61 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 0.81 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | May 2006 | Text search only | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christopher A. KitchenKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Marcus J. WilliamsDavis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- William H. Hinman Jr.Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- David C. BacaDavis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.58× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher A. KitchenKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| Marcus J. WilliamsDavis Wright Tremaine LLP | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| William H. Hinman Jr.Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 2.18 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 160 | 1.27 | 0.15 | 0.90 |
| David C. BacaDavis Wright Tremaine LLP | May 2006 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 2.58 | 0.89 |