WILSHIRE BANCORP INC WIBC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1285224Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked May 2011 · Named in a filing · 1,224 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in a filing · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Jenkens & GilchristFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 279 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Apr 2016 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Apr 2016 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 268 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenberg Traurig | May 2011 | Named in a filing | 1,224 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.12 |
| Hunton & Williams | Jul 2008 | Named in a filing | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Jenkens & Gilchrist | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 279 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 1.01 |
| Morgan Lewis | Apr 2016 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.01 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Apr 2016 | Text search only | 826 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.14 |
| Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 268 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ben ChungMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Mark J. KelsonGreenberg TraurigFirst linked May 2011 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ben ChungMorrison & Foerster | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 1.47 |
| Mark J. KelsonGreenberg Traurig | May 2011 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 1.75 |