China Carbon Graphite Group, Inc.
CIK 1284450Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Holland & HartFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in a filing · 240 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Dec 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Warren J. Soloski A Professional CorporationFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.99× · Went dark 1.34× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holland & Hart | Feb 2010 | Named in a filing | 240 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.86 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Feb 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Dec 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Warren J. Soloski A Professional Corporation | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 23 | 1.99 | 1.34 | 0.39 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ari EdelmanReed SmithFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Bill HuoBecker & Poliakoff LLPFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.54×
- Christopher S. AugusteKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Warren J. SoloskiFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 1.68× · 95% wipeout 0.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ari EdelmanReed Smith | Feb 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| Bill HuoBecker & Poliakoff LLP | Feb 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.54 |
| Christopher S. AugusteKramer Levin Naftalis | Feb 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 90 | 1.83 | 1.24 | 1.42 |
| Warren J. Soloski | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 40 | 1.56 | 1.68 | 0.21 |