HOMEBANC CORP HMB (last ticker on record)
CIK 1283683Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Aug 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Alston & Bird | Mar 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Laura G. ThatcherAlston & BirdFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in a filing · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Mark C. KanalyAlston & BirdFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 0.23×
- Ralph F. MacDonald IIIAlston & BirdFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura G. ThatcherAlston & Bird | Jul 2004 | Named in a filing | 45 | 0.83 | 1.24 | 1.06 |
| Mark C. KanalyAlston & Bird | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.53 | 0.79 | 0.23 |
| Ralph F. MacDonald IIIAlston & Bird | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.56 | 0.72 | 0.90 |