AMERICAN CAMPUS COMMUNITIES INC ACC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1283630Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Dentons US LLPFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Locke LordFirst linked Apr 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 179 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Locke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Shaw PittmanFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Durham Jones & PinegarFirst linked May 2022 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Allen & OveryFirst linked Apr 2008 · Text search only · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Apr 2008 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Davis Graham & StubbsFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 142 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Glast, Phillips & Murray, P.C.First linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.91× · Went dark 1.08× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Herrick, Feinstein LLPFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 1.94× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Aug 2022 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Dentons US LLP | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 102 | 0.91 | 0.40 | 1.48 |
| Locke Lord | Apr 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 179 | 1.70 | 0.54 | 1.00 |
| Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 106 | 1.24 | 0.72 | 1.73 |
| Shaw Pittman | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 149 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| Willkie Farr | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Durham Jones & Pinegar | May 2022 | Text search only | 47 | 1.70 | 1.06 | 1.40 |
| Allen & Overy | Apr 2008 | Text search only | 244 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 0.66 |
| Reed Smith | Apr 2008 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Venable LLP | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
| Davis Graham & Stubbs | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 142 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.46 |
| Glast, Phillips & Murray, P.C. | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 27 | 2.91 | 1.08 | 0.96 |
| Herrick, Feinstein LLP | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 47 | 0.53 | 1.94 | 0.32 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian M. StadlerSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.31×
- Matthew B. RogersSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Bryan L. GoolsbyLocke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Toni WeinsteinLocke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Edward F. PetroskySidley AustinFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.96× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- Donald A. Hammett Jr.Locke LordFirst linked Apr 2008 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian M. StadlerSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Aug 2022 | Named in a filing | 39 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.31 |
| Matthew B. RogersSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Aug 2022 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Bryan L. GoolsbyLocke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Toni WeinsteinLocke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Edward F. PetroskySidley Austin | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 45 | 0.91 | 0.96 | 0.44 |
| Donald A. Hammett Jr.Locke Lord | Apr 2008 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.14 |