GREENHILL & CO INC GHL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1282977Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Aug 2019 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- McCarter & EnglishFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 141 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sidley Austin | Aug 2019 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Davis Polk | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Mar 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| HALE AND DORR | May 2005 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | May 2005 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Bryan Cave | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| McCarter & English | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 141 | 1.18 | 0.69 | 0.78 |
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jared M. FishmanSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Sep 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.37×
- John E. EstesSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Sep 2017 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Barbara NimsDavis PolkFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- David B. HarmsSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jeffrey SmallCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Nicholas A. KronfeldDavis PolkFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.34×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jared M. FishmanSullivan & Cromwell | Sep 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 0.37 |
| John E. EstesSullivan & Cromwell | Sep 2017 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.08 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Barbara NimsDavis Polk | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| David B. HarmsSullivan & Cromwell | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 19 | 2.31 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jeffrey SmallCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 15 | 2.81 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Nicholas A. KronfeldDavis Polk | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 27 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 0.34 |