COINMACH SERVICE CORP DRA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1282858Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- White & CaseFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Gardere Wynne Sewell LLPFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White & Case | Aug 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Mayer Brown | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 117 | 1.13 | 0.97 | 1.24 |
| Heller Ehrman | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ronald S. BrodyMayer BrownFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Randall B. SchaiHeller EhrmanFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald S. BrodyMayer Brown | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Randall B. SchaiHeller Ehrman | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |