BATTALION OIL CORP BATL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1282648Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Oct 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jan 2016 to Jun 2019
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Conner & WintersFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in a filing · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Sep 2016 · Named in a filing · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Davis Graham & StubbsFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in a filing · 142 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in a filing · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- McAfee & Taft A Professional CorporationFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Jan 2024 · Text search only · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Baker BottsFirst linked May 2012 · Text search only · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conner & Winters | Nov 2017 | Named in a filing | 66 | 1.06 | 0.19 | 1.00 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Sep 2016 | Named in a filing | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.89 |
| Davis Graham & Stubbs | Mar 2013 | Named in a filing | 142 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.39 |
| Mayer Brown | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.93 |
| Thompson & Knight | Mar 2012 | Named in a filing | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.30 |
| McAfee & Taft A Professional Corporation | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 63 | 1.24 | 0.44 | 1.16 |
| Graubard Miller | Mar 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.15 |
| K&L Gates | Jan 2024 | Text search only | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.20 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Baker Botts | May 2012 | Text search only | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 0.98 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David S. BakstMayer BrownFirst linked Mar 2026 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Bruce F. PerceMayer BrownFirst linked Jan 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Kirk TuckerThompson & KnightFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- William T. Heller IVThompson & KnightFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Charles L. StraussFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.29×
- David J. KetelslegerMcAfee & Taft A Professional CorporationFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- THEODORE M. ELAMMcAfee & Taft A Professional CorporationFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Jason C. DreibelbisK&L GatesFirst linked Jan 2024 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Jeffrey M. GallantGraubard MillerFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 195 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David S. BakstMayer Brown | Mar 2026 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.29 |
| Bruce F. PerceMayer Brown | Jan 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 2.04 | 0.00 | 1.04 |
| Kirk TuckerThompson & Knight | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| William T. Heller IVThompson & Knight | Mar 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Charles L. StraussFulbright & Jaworski | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 2.29 |
| David J. KetelslegerMcAfee & Taft A Professional Corporation | Jul 2006 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.93 | 1.73 |
| THEODORE M. ELAMMcAfee & Taft A Professional Corporation | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| Jason C. DreibelbisK&L Gates | Jan 2024 | Text search only | 8 | 1.47 | 0.00 | 1.62 |
| Jeffrey M. GallantGraubard Miller | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 195 | 0.96 | 0.63 | 1.19 |