AXTEL SAB DE CV
CIK 1282636Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Morris JamesFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| Akin Gump | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 582 | 1.21 | 0.52 | 1.16 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.82 |
| Morris James | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 95 | 1.62 | 0.42 | 0.89 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.81 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jonathan I. MarkCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jan 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Roger AndrusCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.63×
- Patrick J. DooleyAkin GumpFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
- William J. Whelan IIICravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan I. MarkCahill Gordon & Reindel | Jan 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Roger AndrusCahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 1.63 |
| Patrick J. DooleyAkin Gump | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 21 | 1.83 | 0.00 | 0.48 |
| William J. Whelan IIICravath Swaine & Moore | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 51 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.65 |