TOWN SPORTS INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS INC CLUBQ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1281774Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Sep 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Apr 2007 to Sep 2020
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in a filing · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Olshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Jul 2017 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Preston Gates & EllisFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akerman LLP | Jan 2022 | Named in a filing | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
| Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Jul 2017 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.38 | 0.86 | 1.22 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Proskauer Rose | Jul 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Preston Gates & Ellis | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 159 | 1.36 | 1.62 | 1.44 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael NathanSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Glenn M. ReiterSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.04×
- Allan R. WilliamsProskauer RoseFirst linked Oct 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 4.68× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- James P. GerkisProskauer RoseFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.76×
- Julie M. AllenProskauer RoseFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- William M. HartnettCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Kirk A. RadkeWillkie FarrFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael NathanSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Oct 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Glenn M. ReiterSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 2.04 |
| Allan R. WilliamsProskauer Rose | Oct 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 4.68 | 0.96 |
| James P. GerkisProskauer Rose | Jul 2005 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 1.76 |
| Julie M. AllenProskauer Rose | Jul 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 1.49 | 0.50 | 1.38 |
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| William M. HartnettCahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 40 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Kirk A. RadkeWillkie Farr | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 12 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.63 |