PUREDEPTH, INC.
CIK 1281108Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- HART & TRINENFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 2.13× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Dec 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 88 | 0.65 | 0.83 | 1.52 |
| HART & TRINEN | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 56 | 1.71 | 2.13 | 0.70 |
| Heller Ehrman | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- JAMES M. KOSHLANDDLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.38× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- William M. MowerMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- William T. HartHART & TRINENFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 79 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.63× · Went dark 2.16× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Paul D. ChestovichMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 2.57×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JAMES M. KOSHLANDDLA Piper | Jan 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.00 | 2.38 | 1.31 |
| William M. MowerMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 30 | 0.52 | 0.75 | 1.61 |
| William T. HartHART & TRINEN | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 79 | 1.63 | 2.16 | 0.95 |
| Paul D. ChestovichMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP | May 2006 | Text search only | 15 | 1.72 | 1.17 | 2.57 |