ACCELERON PHARMA INC XLRN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1280600Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Oct 2021 · Named in a filing · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Oct 2021 · Named in a filing · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Foley HoagFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Goulston & StorrsFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Jones DayFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 685 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Oct 2021 | Named in a filing | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 1.01 |
| Covington & Burling | Oct 2021 | Named in a filing | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.97 |
| Ropes & Gray | Jul 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.97 | 0.14 | 0.91 |
| Foley Hoag | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 186 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 1.14 |
| Goulston & Storrs | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 86 | 0.90 | 0.34 | 1.30 |
| Jones Day | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 685 | 1.25 | 0.55 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Catherine J. DarganCovington & BurlingFirst linked Oct 2021 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.35×
- Michael J. RiellaCovington & BurlingFirst linked Oct 2021 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Rachel PhillipsRopes & GrayFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.99×
- Marc A. RubensteinRopes & GrayFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine J. DarganCovington & Burling | Oct 2021 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.35 |
| Michael J. RiellaCovington & Burling | Oct 2021 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Rachel PhillipsRopes & Gray | Aug 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 1.99 |
| Marc A. RubensteinRopes & Gray | Jul 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 48 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 1.25 |