Wright Investors Service Holdings, Inc. IWSH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1279715Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Day Pitney LLPFirst linked Apr 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Jan 2013 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Bell Boyd & LloydFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day Pitney LLP | Apr 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 69 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Duane Morris | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Willkie Farr | Jan 2013 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Bell Boyd & Lloyd | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 50 | 1.36 | 0.38 | 0.47 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Sidley Austin | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Scott W. GoodmanDay Pitney LLPFirst linked Oct 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Frank E. Lawatsch Jr.Day Pitney LLPFirst linked Jan 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert J. HasdayDuane MorrisFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.18× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Michael A. SchwartzWillkie FarrFirst linked Jun 2012 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott W. GoodmanDay Pitney LLP | Oct 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| Frank E. Lawatsch Jr.Day Pitney LLP | Jan 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert J. HasdayDuane Morris | Aug 2004 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 2.18 | 1.46 |
| Michael A. SchwartzWillkie Farr | Jun 2012 | Text search only | 24 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.00 |