UAP HOLDING CORP UAPH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1279529Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 14
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2007 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Bell Boyd & LloydFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Holland & HartFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 240 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Stinson Morrison HeckerFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Stoel RivesFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Watkins Ludlam Winter & StennisFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.31×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2007 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Akin Gump | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Faegre & Benson | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Bell Boyd & Lloyd | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 50 | 1.36 | 0.38 | 0.47 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| Holland & Hart | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 240 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.86 |
| Holland & Knight | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| Perkins Coie | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Stinson Morrison Hecker | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 93 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Stoel Rives | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 208 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 1.20 |
| Venable LLP | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
| Watkins Ludlam Winter & Stennis | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 32 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.31 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew J. NussbaumWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2007 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Gavin D. SolotarWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2007 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Douglas R. WrightFaegre & BensonFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Rosa A. TestaniAkin GumpFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- David J. Johnson Jr.O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew J. NussbaumWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2007 | Named in a filing | 29 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Gavin D. SolotarWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2007 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Douglas R. WrightFaegre & Benson | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 23 | 0.75 | 1.55 | 1.30 |
| Rosa A. TestaniAkin Gump | Oct 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
| David J. Johnson Jr.O Melveny & Myers LLP | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 26 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.89 |