WELLCARE HEALTH PLANS, INC. WCG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1279363Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Nov 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked May 2010 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Irell & ManellaFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 1.09× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Stevens & LeeFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLPFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 350 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | May 2010 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Dec 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Feb 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Irell & Manella | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 76 | 1.73 | 1.09 | 1.23 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Stevens & Lee | May 2004 | Text search only | 127 | 1.08 | 0.74 | 0.59 |
| Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 350 | 1.17 | 0.81 | 1.52 |
| Foley & Lardner | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Morgan Lewis | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2018 · Named in a filing · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Timothy CruickshankKirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2018 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- William G. FarrarSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.45×
- Christine M. PallaresHogan & HartsonFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert K. SmithHunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 5.36× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- J. Warren Gorrell Jr.Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Stuart A. BarrHogan & HartsonFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Jason T. SimonGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 120 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Steven W. VazquezFoley & LardnerFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 1.69× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Dennis M. MyersKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Martin A. TraberFoley & LardnerFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 2.27× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | Nov 2018 | Named in a filing | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| Timothy CruickshankKirkland & Ellis | Nov 2018 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| William G. FarrarSullivan & Cromwell | Aug 2012 | Named in a filing | 23 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 0.45 |
| Christine M. PallaresHogan & Hartson | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert K. SmithHunton Andrews Kurth LLP | Jun 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.22 | 5.36 | 0.77 |
| J. Warren Gorrell Jr.Hogan & Hartson | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Stuart A. BarrHogan & Hartson | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| Jason T. SimonGreenberg Traurig | Feb 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 120 | 0.68 | 0.30 | 1.11 |
| Steven W. VazquezFoley & Lardner | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 11 | 2.03 | 1.69 | 1.73 |
| Dennis M. MyersKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 69 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Martin A. TraberFoley & Lardner | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 21 | 1.50 | 2.27 | 1.55 |