TELEGLOBE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD TLGB (last ticker on record)
CIK 1278739Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.14 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 1.01 |
| Davis Polk | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stuart D. FreedmanSchulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.34×
- John F. KennedyFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 190 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stuart D. FreedmanSchulte Roth & Zabel | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 24 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.34 |
| John F. Kennedy | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 190 | 1.53 | 0.60 | 1.19 |