MICHAEL FOODS INC/NEW
CIK 1278679Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Kaplan Strangis and KaplanFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Mandelbaum SalsburgFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Feb 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Fried Frank | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Kaplan Strangis and Kaplan | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 24 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Mandelbaum Salsburg | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 12 | 0.00 | 1.41 | 0.76 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Todd R. ChandlerWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Marilyn FrenchHUTCHINS, WHEELER & DITTMARFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert C. SchwenkelFried FrankFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd R. ChandlerWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Feb 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 0.78 |
| Marilyn FrenchHUTCHINS, WHEELER & DITTMAR | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert C. SchwenkelFried Frank | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 25 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 1.25 |