AMERICAN CAPITAL ACCESS HOLDINGS LTD
CIK 1278542Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Gardere Wynne Sewell LLPFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Kennedy Covington Lobdell & HickmanFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Seyfarth ShawFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Walkers (Cayman)First linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Dickstein ShapiroFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hogan & Hartson | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 117 | 1.13 | 0.97 | 1.24 |
| Kennedy Covington Lobdell & Hickman | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 53 | 1.04 | 0.38 | 1.29 |
| Maples and Calder | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Seyfarth Shaw | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 102 | 1.57 | 1.38 | 1.25 |
| Walkers (Cayman) | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 191 | 1.25 | 0.26 | 0.82 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Davis Polk | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Dickstein Shapiro | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 41 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Willkie Farr | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christine M. PallaresHogan & HartsonFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Ethan T. JamesDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael J. SilverHogan & HartsonFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christine M. PallaresHogan & Hartson | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Ethan T. JamesDebevoise & Plimpton | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael J. SilverHogan & Hartson | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 30 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 1.39 |