CARDTRONICS PLC CATM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1277856Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Mar 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Jackson Walker L.L.P.First linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 158 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Allen & OveryFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | Mar 2016 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Mar 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Jackson Walker L.L.P. | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 158 | 1.10 | 0.81 | 1.39 |
| Allen & Overy | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 244 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 0.66 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- William D. Davis IIBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Gillian A. HobsonVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked May 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- David P. OelmanVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Mar 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 78 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William D. Davis IIBaker & McKenzie | Mar 2016 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Gillian A. HobsonVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | May 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| David P. OelmanVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Mar 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 78 | 1.62 | 0.00 | 1.28 |