ANGIODYNAMICS INC ANGO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1275187Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Feb 2012 · Named in a filing · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Davies Ward Phillips & VinebergFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Bond Schoeneck & KingFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Feb 2012 | Named in a filing | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Dec 2006 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 94 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 1.11 |
| Hogan & Hartson | May 2004 | Text search only | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Reed Smith | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Bond Schoeneck & King | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 29 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- William P. MillsCadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Feb 2012 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Robert B. PincusSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Scott M. TayneDavies Ward Phillips & VinebergFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William P. MillsCadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Feb 2012 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Robert B. PincusSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Dec 2006 | Named in a filing | 36 | 1.68 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Scott M. TayneDavies Ward Phillips & Vineberg | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.66 |