Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. UCTT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1275014Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jul 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Apr 2007 to Mar 2009
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryan Cave | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Davis Polk | Jan 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jason BassettiDavis PolkFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Alan F. DenenbergDavis PolkFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 114 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- John A. ForeWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 1.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Michael A. OcchioliniWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.74×
- Jean M. McLoughlinDavis PolkFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason BassettiDavis Polk | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 4.91 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Alan F. DenenbergDavis Polk | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 114 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| John A. ForeWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jan 2004 | Named in a filing | 56 | 1.86 | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Michael A. OcchioliniWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jan 2004 | Named in a filing | 31 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 2.74 |
| Jean M. McLoughlinDavis Polk | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 24 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.41 |