INHIBITEX, INC. INHX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1274913Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2012 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- SWIDLER & BERLIN, CHARTEREDFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 78 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.75× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- SILLER WILKFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.07× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Jeffers, Shaff & Falk, LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.07× · Went dark 1.89× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- LONG ALDRIDGE & NORMANFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Stites & HarbisonFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Feb 2012 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Dechert LLP | Jan 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| SWIDLER & BERLIN, CHARTERED | Mar 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 78 | 0.98 | 1.75 | 1.36 |
| SILLER WILK | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 9 | 0.95 | 1.07 | 0.95 |
| Jeffers, Shaff & Falk, LLP | May 2004 | Text search only | 12 | 3.07 | 1.89 | 1.27 |
| King & Spalding | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| LONG ALDRIDGE & NORMAN | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 25 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Stites & Harbison | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 35 | 0.19 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel E. WolfKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2012 · Named in a filing · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.30×
- David FoxKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2012 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
- Richard A. GoldbergDechert LLPFirst linked Jan 2012 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.20× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Samuel KatzHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
- David S. RosenthalDechert LLPFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Bryan J. PitkoStinson Leonard Street LLPFirst linked Apr 2008 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Mark R. ZiebellSnell & WilmerFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel E. WolfKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2012 | Named in a filing | 44 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 0.30 |
| David FoxKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2012 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 0.32 |
| Richard A. GoldbergDechert LLP | Jan 2012 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.34 | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Samuel KatzHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Jun 2007 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.45 |
| David S. RosenthalDechert LLP | Mar 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 1.35 | 0.88 | 1.30 |
| Bryan J. PitkoStinson Leonard Street LLP | Apr 2008 | Text search only | 19 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Mark R. ZiebellSnell & Wilmer | May 2004 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.48 |