HOSPIRA INC HSP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1274057Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jan 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayer Brown | Dec 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Philip J. NiehoffMayer BrownFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- James T. LidburyMayer BrownFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Scott J. DavisMayer BrownFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.46×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philip J. NiehoffMayer Brown | Jul 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 1.68 | 0.66 | 0.57 |
| James T. LidburyMayer Brown | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.83 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Scott J. DavisMayer Brown | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 0.46 |