Nutrastar International Inc. NUIN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1273385Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jan 2011 to Dec 2016
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Holland & HartFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in a filing · 240 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in a filing · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Jan 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Holland & Hart | Jun 2009 | Named in a filing | 240 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.86 |
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Aug 2008 | Named in a filing | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joseph R. TianoPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 3.08× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Scott C. KlinePillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 3.13× · 95% wipeout 2.34×
- Richard A. FriedmanSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in a filing · 190 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.93× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Dennis BrovaroneFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in a filing · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Jing ZhangPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jan 2010 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 3.61× · 95% wipeout 2.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph R. TianoPillsbury Winthrop | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.79 | 3.08 | 1.14 |
| Scott C. KlinePillsbury Winthrop | Jun 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.73 | 3.13 | 2.34 |
| Richard A. FriedmanSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Aug 2008 | Named in a filing | 190 | 1.27 | 1.93 | 1.29 |
| Dennis Brovarone | Jan 2004 | Named in a filing | 46 | 1.62 | 1.40 | 1.04 |
| Jing ZhangPillsbury Winthrop | Jan 2010 | Text search only | 9 | 1.72 | 3.61 | 2.58 |