NORTH AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC NOA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1272869Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLPFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 78 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Bracewell & GuilianiFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 2.24×
- Macleod DixonFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Burnet Duckworth & PalmerFirst linked Dec 2003 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Miller ThomsonFirst linked Dec 2003 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2003 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borden Ladner Gervais LLP | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 78 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Bracewell LLP | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 1.03 |
| Bracewell & Guiliani | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 13 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 2.24 |
| Macleod Dixon | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 31 | 0.46 | 0.57 | 1.49 |
| Mayer Brown | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Burnet Duckworth & Palmer | Dec 2003 | Text search only | 39 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 1.56 |
| Miller Thomson | Dec 2003 | Text search only | 49 | 1.03 | 1.02 | 1.39 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2003 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gary W. OrloffBracewell LLPFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Ronald S. BrodyMayer BrownFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gary W. OrloffBracewell LLP | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| Ronald S. BrodyMayer Brown | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |