T Bancshares, Inc.
CIK 1272754Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Norton RoseFirst linked Jan 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Jenkens & GilchristFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 279 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, L.L.P.First linked Dec 2003 · Text search only · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
- Foster PepperFirst linked Dec 2003 · Text search only · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 1.92×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2003 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Powell GoldsteinFirst linked Dec 2003 · Text search only · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Stevens & LeeFirst linked Dec 2003 · Text search only · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norton Rose | Jan 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| Hunton & Williams | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Jenkens & Gilchrist | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 279 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 1.11 |
| Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, L.L.P. | Dec 2003 | Text search only | 52 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.38 |
| Foster Pepper | Dec 2003 | Text search only | 43 | 0.81 | 0.62 | 1.92 |
| Goodwin Procter | Dec 2003 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Powell Goldstein | Dec 2003 | Text search only | 196 | 0.71 | 0.48 | 0.65 |
| Stevens & Lee | Dec 2003 | Text search only | 127 | 1.08 | 0.74 | 0.59 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael G. KeeleyNorton RoseFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Geoffrey S. KayJenkens & GilchristFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Peter G. WeinstockHunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.43×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael G. KeeleyNorton Rose | Jul 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geoffrey S. KayJenkens & Gilchrist | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Peter G. WeinstockHunton Andrews Kurth LLP | Dec 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.43 |