root9B Holdings, Inc. RTNB (last ticker on record)
CIK 1272550Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Aug 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- May 2015 to Apr 2018
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C.First linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Michael H. FreedmanFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.67×
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Jul 2010 · Text search only · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Olshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Jan 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C. | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 1.26 | 0.95 | 1.31 |
| Michael H. Freedman | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.76 | 0.00 | 1.67 |
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Jul 2010 | Text search only | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
| Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 390 | 1.38 | 0.86 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Howard S. JacobsKatten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.67× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Patrick J. O'MalleyDLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.34×
- Ron Ben-BassatSullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.44× · Went dark 3.59× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Peter CampitielloKane Kessler, P.C.First linked Jan 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.15× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Seth I. RubinRuskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C.First linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 2.30× · 95% wipeout 2.31×
- Stuart M. SiegerRuskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C.First linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.28×
- Michael H. FreedmanSilverman, Collura, Chernis & Balzano, P.C.First linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 2.10× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Patrick J. O MalleyDLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2016 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 4.16×
- Robert L. DavisO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Dec 2011 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Joseph M. LucoskyLucosky Brookman LLPFirst linked Jul 2010 · Text search only · 188 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 1.81× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- David J. AdlerOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.54× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.67×
- Jeffrey S. SpindlerOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 1.93× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Steve WoloskyOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Howard S. JacobsKatten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Jan 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.00 | 1.67 | 1.59 |
| Patrick J. O'MalleyDLA Piper | Jan 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 2.34 |
| Ron Ben-BassatSullivan & Worcester LLP | Apr 2013 | Named in a filing | 39 | 0.44 | 3.59 | 0.90 |
| Peter CampitielloKane Kessler, P.C. | Jan 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 2.15 | 1.30 | 1.37 |
| Seth I. RubinRuskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C. | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.72 | 2.30 | 2.31 |
| Stuart M. SiegerRuskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C. | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.28 |
| Michael H. FreedmanSilverman, Collura, Chernis & Balzano, P.C. | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.49 | 2.10 | 1.55 |
| Patrick J. O MalleyDLA Piper | Jan 2016 | Text search only | 11 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 4.16 |
| Robert L. DavisO Melveny & Myers LLP | Dec 2011 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| Joseph M. LucoskyLucosky Brookman LLP | Jul 2010 | Text search only | 188 | 1.24 | 1.81 | 1.24 |
| David J. AdlerOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 18 | 0.54 | 1.17 | 1.67 |
| Jeffrey S. SpindlerOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 15 | 1.10 | 1.93 | 1.35 |
| Steve WoloskyOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 95 | 1.71 | 0.37 | 0.90 |