REDDY ICE HOLDINGS INC FRZ (last ticker on record)

CIK 1268984Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restatement
SEC/DOJ scrutiny
95% wipeout
Delisting notice (not a red flag)
Bankruptcy
Restructuring

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 5; Newest began Apr 2012
Largest fall in its shares: 99%; Jul 2007 to Apr 2012
Law firms: 9; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 8; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

May 25, 2012Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 17, 2012Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 17, 2012Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 22, 2011Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 30, 2011Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Sep 27, 2011Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 1, 2009A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
Nov 18, 2008Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 14, 2008Shares down 95% from their high
Oct 24, 2008A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 5, 2006Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 31, 2005Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
DLA Piper	Jul 2007	Named in SEC correspondence	1,184	1.00	0.45	1.20
Cravath Swaine & Moore	Feb 2005	Named in SEC correspondence	839	1.29	0.03	0.85
Akin Gump	Nov 2003	Named in a filing	582	1.24	0.52	1.25
Cahill Gordon & Reindel	Nov 2003	Named in SEC correspondence	598	1.03	0.18	0.77
Shearman & Sterling	Jul 2010	Text search only	2,649	1.21	0.13	0.87
Fried Frank	Apr 2008	Text search only	540	1.33	0.24	0.94
Mayer Brown	Nov 2003	Text search only	680	0.98	0.34	0.94
Smith Anderson	Nov 2003	Text search only	67	1.24	0.00	1.41
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.	Nov 2003	Text search only	783	1.09	0.11	1.03

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Jamie KnoxDLA Piper	Oct 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	10	0.74	0.00	0.00
George A. StephanakisCravath Swaine & Moore	Feb 2005	Named in SEC correspondence	19	2.57	0.00	1.89
Kris F. HeinzelmanCravath Swaine & Moore	Feb 2005	Named in SEC correspondence	65	1.32	0.00	1.03
Alan SchoenbaumAkin Gump	Nov 2003	Named in a filing	8	2.56	4.22	1.16
John PapachristosCahill Gordon & Reindel	Nov 2003	Named in SEC correspondence	7	1.45	0.00	1.48
Roger MeltzerCahill Gordon & Reindel	Nov 2003	Named in SEC correspondence	18	0.51	0.00	0.95
Christopher B. CapelSmith Anderson	Nov 2003	Text search only	7	1.27	0.00	2.34
Robert L. KimballVinson & Elkins L.L.P.	Nov 2003	Text search only	25	2.50	0.00	0.63