TNS INC TNS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1268671Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Arent FoxFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- McCann FitzGeraldFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arent Fox | Nov 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 90 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.91 |
| McCann FitzGerald | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Nixon Peabody | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.90 |
| Winston & Strawn | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey E. JordanArent FoxFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 2.20× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- John C. PartiganNixon PeabodyFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Stephen L. RitchieKirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey E. JordanArent Fox | Nov 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.48 | 2.20 | 1.10 |
| John C. PartiganNixon Peabody | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 13 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| Stephen L. RitchieKirkland & Ellis | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |