New Generation Biofuels Holdings, Inc NGBF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1268236Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.First linked Sep 2010 · Named in a filing · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in a filing · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in a filing · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. | Sep 2010 | Named in a filing | 154 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 1.07 |
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | Jun 2010 | Named in a filing | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Jul 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Oct 2003 | Named in a filing | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven M. KaufmanHogan & HartsonFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.77×
- Ira N. RosnerGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 1.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in a filing · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven M. KaufmanHogan & Hartson | Jul 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.00 | 0.83 | 1.77 |
| Ira N. RosnerGreenberg Traurig | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 24 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 1.10 |
| Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Oct 2003 | Named in a filing | 338 | 1.23 | 1.39 | 0.89 |