HUNTSMAN LLC
CIK 1266794Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Stoel RivesFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- VAN COTT BAGLEY CORNWALL & McCARTHYFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Winston & Strawn | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Stoel Rives | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 208 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 1.20 |
| VAN COTT BAGLEY CORNWALL & McCARTHY | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 14 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathan W. JonesStoel Rives | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 9 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.03 |