Broder Bros., Co.
CIK 1266700Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Aug 2011 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Calfee Halter & GriswoldFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 70 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
- Jaffe Raitt Heuer & WeissFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.26× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Stites & HarbisonFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Oct 2003 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Paul Hastings | Aug 2011 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Calfee Halter & Griswold | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 70 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 1.58 |
| Jaffe Raitt Heuer & Weiss | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 37 | 0.26 | 0.50 | 1.65 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Stites & Harbison | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 35 | 0.19 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dennis M. MyersKirkland & Ellis | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 69 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.64 |