BIOVERIS CORP BIOV (last ticker on record)
CIK 1264899Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Potter Anderson & CorroonFirst linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.82 |
| HALE AND DORR | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| Davis Polk | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Foley & Lardner | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.98 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.20 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.84 |
| Potter Anderson & Corroon | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 127 | 1.41 | 0.45 | 0.83 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philip A. GelstonCravath Swaine & Moore | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 15 | 1.86 | 0.00 | 1.25 |