UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD INDM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1263813Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Feb 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.First linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 163 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Saul EwingFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 100 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Drinker Biddle & ReathFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 213 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.First linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Walkers (Cayman)First linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayer Brown | Feb 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Cozen O'Connor P.C. | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 163 | 1.03 | 0.63 | 0.94 |
| Reed Smith | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Saul Ewing | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 100 | 1.22 | 1.01 | 1.14 |
| Drinker Biddle & Reath | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 213 | 1.46 | 0.77 | 1.25 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P. | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 145 | 1.23 | 1.02 | 0.87 |
| Maples and Calder | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Walkers (Cayman) | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 191 | 1.25 | 0.26 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Edward S. BestMayer BrownFirst linked Feb 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Philip J. NiehoffMayer BrownFirst linked Feb 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- Daniel E. WolfKirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.30×
- Gary I. HorowitzSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- ELLIOTT V. STEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael B. PollackReed SmithFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Paul J. JaskotReed SmithFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.76× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Peter J. GordonSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.15× · 95% wipeout 1.68×
- Robert C. JuelkeDrinker Biddle & ReathFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edward S. BestMayer Brown | Feb 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| Philip J. NiehoffMayer Brown | Feb 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 1.68 | 0.66 | 0.57 |
| Daniel E. WolfKirkland & Ellis | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 44 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 0.30 |
| Gary I. HorowitzSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 1.39 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| ELLIOTT V. STEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael B. PollackReed Smith | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 7 | 3.70 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Paul J. JaskotReed Smith | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 2.76 | 0.77 |
| Peter J. GordonSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 18 | 1.00 | 1.15 | 1.68 |
| Robert C. JuelkeDrinker Biddle & Reath | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 5 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.00 |