HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST INC

CIK 1262959Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

None

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 0; None on record
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 30; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 3; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP	Jun 2011	Named in SEC correspondence	1,125	1.23	0.20	0.96
Greenberg Traurig	Jul 2007	Named in SEC correspondence	1,223	1.01	1.03	1.10
Venable LLP	Jul 2007	Named in a filing	506	0.79	0.38	0.73
Baker Botts L.L.P.	Sep 2003	Named in SEC correspondence	495	1.32	0.09	1.03
Reed Smith	Oct 2009	Text search only	487	1.15	0.77	1.13
Bryan Cave	Jun 2008	Text search only	471	1.09	0.76	0.98
Quarles & Brady	Jun 2008	Text search only	170	0.74	0.70	0.79
Shook Hardy & Bacon	Jun 2008	Text search only	35	1.07	0.00	1.76
Fulbright & Jaworski	Jan 2008	Text search only	359	1.10	0.75	1.35
Hunton & Williams	Jan 2008	Text search only	404	1.06	0.36	0.65
Locke Lord	Jan 2008	Text search only	179	1.70	0.54	1.00
Musick Peeler & Garrett	Jan 2008	Text search only	18	0.47	1.05	1.11
Alston & Bird	Jun 2006	Text search only	583	0.99	0.39	0.79
Arnall Golden Gregory	Jun 2006	Text search only	60	0.66	1.11	1.13
King & Spalding	Jun 2006	Text search only	426	1.28	0.35	1.04
Powell Goldstein	Jun 2006	Text search only	196	0.71	0.48	0.65
Foley & Lardner	Apr 2006	Text search only	498	1.00	0.71	1.02
Goulston & Storrs	Apr 2006	Text search only	86	0.90	0.34	1.33
Shartsis Friese LLP	Apr 2006	Text search only	52	1.28	0.00	1.62
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Apr 2006	Text search only	2,607	1.15	0.19	0.85
Bell Boyd & Lloyd	Dec 2005	Text search only	50	1.36	0.38	0.47
Paul Hastings	Dec 2005	Text search only	768	0.98	0.72	1.09
Preston Gates & Ellis	Dec 2005	Text search only	159	1.36	1.62	1.44
Thelen Reid & Priest	Dec 2005	Text search only	124	0.98	1.16	1.20
Gersten Savage LLP	Mar 2004	Text search only	137	1.20	1.38	1.22
Kelley Drye & Warren	Mar 2004	Text search only	152	1.24	0.53	1.21
Kirkland & Ellis	Mar 2004	Text search only	1,686	0.98	0.17	0.87
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.	Mar 2004	Text search only	145	1.23	1.02	0.87
Piper Rudnick	Dec 2003	Text search only	183	1.09	0.37	0.82
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett	Dec 2003	Text search only	1,396	1.28	0.11	0.92

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	95% wipeout
James J. MoloneyGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP	Jun 2011	Named in SEC correspondence	40	2.20	0.30
Judith D. FryerGreenberg Traurig	Jul 2007	Named in SEC correspondence	17	0.00	0.66
Gene J. OshmanBaker Botts L.L.P.	Dec 2005	Named in a filing	16	1.31	1.39