DAYSTAR TECHNOLOGIES INC DSTI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1262200Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jul 2005 to Apr 2014
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in a filing · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Whiteman Osterman & HannaFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.03×
- Tonkon TorpFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Chadbourne & ParkeFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jun 2006 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Jul 2008 | Named in a filing | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Oct 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Goodwin Procter | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Whiteman Osterman & Hanna | Jun 2006 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 2.03 |
| Tonkon Torp | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 24 | 0.31 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Chadbourne & Parke | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 110 | 1.64 | 0.62 | 0.87 |
| Squire Sanders (US) | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Jun 2006 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gordon K. HoCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- John M. GeschkeCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Michael D. MalineGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Thomas P. PalmerTonkon TorpFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gordon K. HoCooley LLP | Jul 2008 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.00 | 1.05 | 1.19 |
| John M. GeschkeCooley LLP | Jul 2008 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.42 |
| Michael D. MalineGoodwin Procter | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 45 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 1.36 |
| Thomas P. PalmerTonkon Torp | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.37 |