Fortinet, Inc. FTNT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1262039Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2009 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fenwick & West LLP | Feb 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Davis Polk | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2009 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ran D. Ben-TzurFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.31×
- Jeffrey R. VetterFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 82 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Jon C. AvinaCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Alan F. DenenbergDavis PolkFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 114 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Katharine A. MartinWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Carmen ChangWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- John A. ForeWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 1.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Larry W. SonsiniWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Sarah K. SolumDavis PolkFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.57×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ran D. Ben-TzurFenwick & West LLP | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.31 |
| Jeffrey R. VetterFenwick & West LLP | Feb 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 82 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| Jon C. AvinaCooley LLP | Jul 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Alan F. DenenbergDavis Polk | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 114 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| Katharine A. MartinWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.38 | 0.00 | 1.14 |
| Carmen ChangWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.84 |
| John A. ForeWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 56 | 1.86 | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Larry W. SonsiniWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 44 | 1.22 | 0.73 | 1.30 |
| Sarah K. SolumDavis Polk | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 44 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 1.57 |