AGILE THERAPEUTICS INC AGRX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1261249Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 2015 to Apr 2024
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Apr 2023 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Hyman Phelps & McNamaraFirst linked Apr 2023 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked May 2014 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Potter Anderson & CorroonFirst linked May 2014 · Text search only · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Morgan Lewis | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Ballard Spahr | Apr 2023 | Text search only | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Hyman Phelps & McNamara | Apr 2023 | Text search only | 105 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 1.08 |
| Cooley LLP | May 2014 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Potter Anderson & Corroon | May 2014 | Text search only | 127 | 1.41 | 0.45 | 0.87 |
| Duane Morris | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bryan S. KeigheryMorgan LewisFirst linked Oct 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Joanne R. SoslowMorgan LewisFirst linked Nov 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Emilio RagosaMorgan LewisFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Peter N. HandrinosLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Steven M. CohenMorgan LewisFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.54×
- Jonathan BellGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Kathleen M. ShayDuane MorrisFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryan S. KeigheryMorgan Lewis | Oct 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 0.85 |
| Joanne R. SoslowMorgan Lewis | Nov 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 1.30 | 0.86 | 0.85 |
| Emilio RagosaMorgan Lewis | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| Peter N. HandrinosLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 85 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| Steven M. CohenMorgan Lewis | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 1.54 |
| Jonathan BellGreenberg Traurig | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 5 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| Kathleen M. ShayDuane Morris | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.48 |