CNL LIFESTYLE PROPERTIES INC
CIK 1261159Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Arnold & PorterFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 254 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Igler & Dougherty, P.A.First linked Oct 2007 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 1.92×
- Shook Hardy & BaconFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnold & Porter | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 254 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 0.84 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Igler & Dougherty, P.A. | Oct 2007 | Text search only | 22 | 0.00 | 0.63 | 1.92 |
| Shook Hardy & Bacon | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 35 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 1.76 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Neil M. GoodmanArnold & PorterFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Richard E. BaltzArnold & PorterFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Judith D. FryerGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neil M. GoodmanArnold & Porter | Oct 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.62 |
| Richard E. BaltzArnold & Porter | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 0.59 |
| Judith D. FryerGreenberg Traurig | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.66 |