BELLUS Health Inc. BLU (last ticker on record)
CIK 1259942Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jun 2023 · Named in a filing · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2022 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Davies Ward Phillips & VinebergFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jun 2023 | Named in a filing | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Goodwin Procter | Apr 2022 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 94 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Krishna VeeraraghavanSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jun 2023 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
- Danielle LauzonGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2022 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Mitchell S. BloomGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2022 · Named in a filing · 109 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Bonnie J. RoeDay Berry & HowardFirst linked May 2007 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.67×
- Scott M. TayneDavies Ward Phillips & VinebergFirst linked Jan 2007 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Guy P. LanderCarter Ledyard & Milburn LLPFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Krishna VeeraraghavanSullivan & Cromwell | Jun 2023 | Named in a filing | 30 | 1.47 | 0.00 | 0.38 |
| Danielle LauzonGoodwin Procter | Apr 2022 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| Mitchell S. BloomGoodwin Procter | Apr 2022 | Named in a filing | 109 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Bonnie J. RoeDay Berry & Howard | May 2007 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 1.67 |
| Scott M. TayneDavies Ward Phillips & Vineberg | Jan 2007 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| Guy P. LanderCarter Ledyard & Milburn LLP | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.80 |