SIGNATURE OFFICE REIT INC
CIK 1256069Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Alston & Bird | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.76 |
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 335 | 1.14 | 0.61 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew M. DavissonDLA PiperFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- R. Neil MillerDLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Brad S. MarkoffAlston & BirdFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.26× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- M. Hill JeffriesAlston & BirdFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Robert H. BergdoltDLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew M. DavissonDLA Piper | Jul 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| R. Neil MillerDLA Piper | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Brad S. MarkoffAlston & Bird | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.92 | 1.26 | 0.66 |
| M. Hill JeffriesAlston & Bird | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 27 | 2.22 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| Robert H. BergdoltDLA Piper | Aug 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.94 |