MEDASSETS INC MDAS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1254419Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in a filing · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Dec 2007 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2016 | Named in a filing | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Willkie Farr | Aug 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.82 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.81 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Reed Smith | Dec 2007 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.12 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Peter MartelliSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Morgan D. ElwynWillkie FarrFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Steven J. GartnerWillkie FarrFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 0.30×
- Michael D. BeauvaisRopes & GrayFirst linked Aug 2007 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Patrick O BrienRopes & GrayFirst linked Aug 2007 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter MartelliSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2016 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Morgan D. ElwynWillkie Farr | Sep 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
| Steven J. GartnerWillkie Farr | Sep 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 0.69 | 0.83 | 0.30 |
| Michael D. BeauvaisRopes & Gray | Aug 2007 | Text search only | 11 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| Patrick O BrienRopes & Gray | Aug 2007 | Text search only | 45 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 1.09 |