CBD MEDIA LLC
CIK 1253808Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Dinsmore & ShohlFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 96 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Dinsmore & Shohl | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 96 | 0.64 | 0.24 | 0.64 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Scott C. HerlihyLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 1.15× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- John E. BarnesDinsmore & ShohlFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David MillerLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Scott R. HaberLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Todd R. ChandlerWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott C. HerlihyLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.15 | 1.15 | 1.74 |
| John E. BarnesDinsmore & Shohl | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David MillerLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 13 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Scott R. HaberLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 24 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| Todd R. ChandlerWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 38 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 0.78 |