LUNA INNOVATIONS INC LUNA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1239819Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Apr 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Aug 2021 to Apr 2025
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2015 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Mar 2015 · Text search only · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Patton BoggsFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Arnold & PorterFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 254 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Gentry Locke Rakes & MooreFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| DLA Piper | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Mar 2015 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | Mar 2015 | Text search only | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| Patton Boggs | May 2006 | Text search only | 186 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.35 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Arnold & Porter | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 254 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 0.84 |
| Gentry Locke Rakes & Moore | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.35 |
| Piper Rudnick | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mark BallantyneCooley LLPFirst linked Jan 2024 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Brian F. LeafCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in a filing · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Darren K. DeStefanoCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Marjorie Sybul AdamsDLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Mark R. FitzgeraldWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.64×
- TREVOR J. CHAPLICKProskauer RoseFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Bryan J. PitkoStinson Leonard Street LLPFirst linked Feb 2015 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Alfred BrowneCooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2015 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark BallantyneCooley LLP | Jan 2024 | Named in a filing | 29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| Brian F. LeafCooley LLP | Sep 2010 | Named in a filing | 43 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Darren K. DeStefanoCooley LLP | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.32 |
| Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLP | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 184 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Marjorie Sybul AdamsDLA Piper | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Mark R. FitzgeraldWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 2.64 |
| TREVOR J. CHAPLICKProskauer Rose | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| Bryan J. PitkoStinson Leonard Street LLP | Feb 2015 | Text search only | 19 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Alfred BrowneCooley LLP | Feb 2015 | Text search only | 6 | 2.46 | 0.00 | 2.87 |