GENESIS HEALTHCARE CORP GHCI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1236736Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 15
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Blank RomeFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in a filing · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Day Berry & HowardFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Fox Rothschild LLPFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Freeborn & PetersFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 2.89× · 95% wipeout 0.46×
- Goulston & StorrsFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Shipman & GoodwinFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- SPILMAN THOMAS & BATTLEFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.43×
- Steptoe & JohnsonFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- White and WilliamsFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- WOLFF & SAMSONFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank Rome | Oct 2003 | Named in a filing | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Day Berry & Howard | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 61 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 0.81 |
| Duane Morris | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Fox Rothschild LLP | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 149 | 0.92 | 1.38 | 0.90 |
| Freeborn & Peters | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 22 | 0.48 | 2.89 | 0.46 |
| Goulston & Storrs | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 86 | 0.90 | 0.34 | 1.33 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Shipman & Goodwin | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 54 | 1.25 | 0.82 | 1.18 |
| SPILMAN THOMAS & BATTLE | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 19 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.43 |
| Steptoe & Johnson | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 80 | 1.10 | 0.65 | 1.34 |
| White and Williams | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 20 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| WOLFF & SAMSON | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 16 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| Morgan Lewis | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard J. McMahonBlank Rome | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.09 |