MOMENTA PHARMACEUTICALS INC MNTA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1235010Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Fish & RichardsonFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 2.73×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Foley HoagFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Williams & ConnollyFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| HALE AND DORR | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Fish & Richardson | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 37 | 0.93 | 1.30 | 2.73 |
| Covington & Burling | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Foley Hoag | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 186 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 1.17 |
| Williams & Connolly | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.80 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- R. Scott SheanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.95× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Gregory P. RodgersLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in a filing · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Dennis CraythornLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Peter N. HandrinosLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in a filing · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Rosemary G. ReillyWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jan 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Philip P. RossettiHALE AND DORRFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Steven D. SingerWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Tod K. ReichertHALE AND DORRFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
- Robert L. BirnbaumFoley HoagFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 1.48× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. Scott SheanLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2020 | Named in a filing | 37 | 1.95 | 0.74 | 0.78 |
| Gregory P. RodgersLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2016 | Named in a filing | 44 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 1.44 |
| Dennis CraythornLatham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| Peter N. HandrinosLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2013 | Named in a filing | 85 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| Rosemary G. ReillyWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jan 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 1.32 |
| Philip P. RossettiHALE AND DORR | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| Steven D. SingerWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 1.27 |
| Tod K. ReichertHALE AND DORR | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 5 | 1.86 | 0.00 | 1.58 |
| Robert L. BirnbaumFoley Hoag | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 9 | 0.83 | 1.48 | 0.82 |