NationsHealth, Inc. NHRX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1233426Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Dec 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Oct 2005 to Dec 2008
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLPFirst linked May 2003 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.29× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked May 2003 · Text search only · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McDermott Will & Emery | Apr 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP | May 2003 | Named in a filing | 37 | 0.37 | 0.29 | 1.34 |
| Graubard Miller | May 2003 | Text search only | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.16 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked May 2003 · Named in a filing · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- William W. Matthews IIIKlehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLPFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | May 2003 | Named in a filing | 231 | 1.06 | 0.74 | 1.33 |
| William W. Matthews IIIKlehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 5 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 1.91 |