NEOPHOTONICS CORP NPTN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1227025Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Zhong Lun Law FirmFirst linked Jan 2011 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Zhong Lun Law Firm | Jan 2011 | Text search only | 90 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Heller Ehrman | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David R. AmblerCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
- Brett D. WhiteCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.27× · Went dark 0.84× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- John H. SellersCooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
- William B. BrentaniSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David R. AmblerCooley LLP | Sep 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 1.82 |
| Brett D. WhiteCooley LLP | Dec 2014 | Named in a filing | 55 | 0.27 | 0.84 | 0.97 |
| John H. SellersCooley LLP | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 1.82 |
| William B. BrentaniSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 41 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 0.67 |